|
Post by Twoddle on Jun 27, 2008 18:33:12 GMT
I've just been informed by a reporter on my television that "... the (economic) slowdown is gathering pace". I'm not entirely sure that that makes sense. Any opinions, please?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Doherty on Jun 27, 2008 19:58:13 GMT
Well, if you can speed up more slowly, can you not slow down faster?
The gathering pace metaphor is unfortunate, though. A horse can't slow down by gathering pace, so I guess that's what makes it sound odd. But we get the drift (and secretly we love this stuff, don't we?)
|
|
|
Post by Twoddle on Jun 27, 2008 20:08:50 GMT
... (and secretly we love this stuff, don't we?) We do. I wonder why?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Doherty on Jun 27, 2008 20:19:06 GMT
It's amusing. I love a good mixed metaphor: hot potatoes coming over the horizon.
|
|
|
Post by Tone on Jun 27, 2008 20:58:26 GMT
>The Deceleration is Increasing<'Tis the second differential (math, yet), Guv. The rate of change of rate of change. (Techie bit! ) And it seems that Newton left it out 'cos he wasn't aware that it mattered! (But then in his world it didn't.) Not normally relevant to activities on Earth, but very important as to why some early space shots didn't go quite where they were expected to! Tone
|
|
|
Post by Vadim on Jun 27, 2008 21:10:44 GMT
>The Deceleration is Increasing<'Tis the second differential (math, yet), Guv. The rate of change of rate of change. (Techie bit! ) And it seems that Newton left it out 'cos he wasn't aware that it mattered! (But then in his world it didn't.) Not normally relevant to activities on Earth, but very important as to why some early space shots didn't go quite where they were expected to! Tone I think you mean the third differential, Tone? The rate of change of deceleration (acceleration). I have heard this used in my current employment. All the way through university I never heard it, or used it., my colleagues write as "mm/s/s/s", I hate this obviously, but can not get them to change it to its correct format. I think they call it "jerk" symbol j.
|
|
|
Post by Vadim on Jun 27, 2008 21:13:00 GMT
Jerk>> How do you do the link thingy with the word "JERK" but with the link behind? >>>update>> Thanks, Paul.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Doherty on Jun 27, 2008 21:17:38 GMT
[url=http://google.com]Here is Google[/url] The above gives Here is Google
|
|
|
Post by Twoddle on Jun 27, 2008 21:21:14 GMT
Oh, goody! I can start telling idiots that they're "third derivatives of position".
|
|
|
Post by Vadim on Jun 27, 2008 21:23:14 GMT
Oh, goody! I can start telling idiots that they're "third derivatives of position". WOW! Have I actually provided the board with something they didn't know? I am truley amazed! 'bout time I gave something back
|
|
|
Post by Twoddle on Jun 27, 2008 21:33:18 GMT
Oh, goody! I can start telling idiots that they're "third derivatives of position". WOW! Have I actually provided the board with something they didn't know? I am truley amazed! 'bout time I gave something back You gave a little too much back, Vadim: it's spelt "truly". I wonder what they call a change in the rate of decrease of acceleration.
|
|
|
Post by Vadim on Jun 27, 2008 21:49:26 GMT
WOW! Have I actually provided the board with something they didn't know? I am truley amazed! 'bout time I gave something back You gave a little too much back, Vadim: it's spelt "truly". I wonder what they call a change in the rate of decrease of acceleration. Jerk? Surely? Doesn't matter wehter it's positive or negative, it's Jerk?
|
|
|
Post by SusanB on Jun 27, 2008 22:20:58 GMT
Why don't I understand what's going on?
|
|
|
Post by Twoddle on Jun 27, 2008 22:45:38 GMT
You gave a little too much back, Vadim: it's spelt "truly". I wonder what they call a change in the rate of decrease of acceleration. Jerk? Surely? Doesn't matter wehter it's positive or negative, it's Jerk? Yes, but what do they call a change in jerk?
|
|
|
Post by Twoddle on Jun 27, 2008 22:47:02 GMT
Why don't I understand what's going on? What makes you think anyone else here does, Susan? Just bluff it.
|
|